top of page


Pontrello~ October 16, 2020


Maskholes are people who:

1. ...Wear a mask at all times in public without questioning the mandate, without questioning the efficacy of masks for its prescribed application, and without noticing the negative symptoms they are experiencing from oxygen deprivation and breathing in their own carbon dioxide through bacteria contaminated face socks for extended duration. 

2. ...Think it is their civic duty to enforce mask wearing on human beings.  In other words they believe it is their job to find you, single you out, and then tattle tale on you to whomever holds authority in a particular situation.  If someone else beats them to it they will derive much pleasure in watching humans being abused or mistreated in various ways such as being kicked off of public transportation or tased at an outdoor soccer game.   

Maskholes must match both criteria but they earn the title "maskhole" primarily because of characteristic number two.  Not all maskholes actually like wearing the face diaper.  Some do some don't.  Some maskholes like wearing the breathing restriction device because they enjoy the security they feel by being in the popular group that persecutes humans.  They also usually feel proud that they are doing what "health experts" ask them to do for the good of the commune.  Some maskholes hate wearing masks, not because they did any research or critical thinking on the subject, but because it's inconvenient.  In those cases they may be miserable in a mask but they are cowards and can't stand up for themselves.  When they spot humans defying the idiotic mandate they resent them.  

Someone was nice enough to send me the following post.  It is not meant for maskholes. It is meant for people with enough common sense to know the mask mandate is harmful and wrong but who are generally lacking necessary facts and information.  The author is a world-renowned neurologist. Her name is Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson.  I do not have the original. I am posting it as I received it.  The doctor states: 

“The rebreathing of our exhaled air will without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a flooding of carbon dioxide. We know that the human brain is very sensitive to oxygen deprivation. There are nerve cells for example in the hippocampus, that can’t be longer than 3 minutes without oxygen – they cannot survive. The acute warning symptoms are headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration, slowing down of the reaction time – reactions of the cognitive system.
However, when you have chronic oxygen deprivation, all of those symptoms disappear, because you get used to it. But your efficiency will remain impaired and the undersupply of oxygen in your brain continues to progress.
We know that neurodegenerative diseases take years to decades to develop. If today you forget your phone number, the breakdown in your brain would have already started 20 or 30 years ago.
 While you’re thinking, that you have gotten used to wearing your mask and rebreathing your own exhaled air, the degenerative processes in your brain are getting amplified as your oxygen deprivation continues.
The second problem is that the nerve cells in your brain are unable to divide themselves normally. So in case our governments will generously allow as to get rid of the masks and go back to breathing oxygen freely again in a few months, the lost nerve cells will no longer be regenerated. What is gone is gone.
[..]I do not wear a mask, I need my brain to think. I want to have a clear head when I deal with my patients, and not be in a carbon dioxide induced anaesthesia.
 [..]There is no unfounded medical exemption from face masks because oxygen deprivation is dangerous for every single brain. It must be the free decision of every human being whether they want to wear a mask that is absolutely ineffective to protect themselves from a virus.
For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no. Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth. Their brain is also incredibly active, as it is has so much to learn. The child’s brain, or the youth’s brain is thirsting for oxygen. The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires.  In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active.
To deprive a child’s or an adolescent’s brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.
The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function.  We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Conscious and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.
 An absolute medical contraindication in medicine means that this drug, this therapy, this method or measure should not be used – is not allowed to be used. To coerce an entire population to use an absolute medical contraindication by force, there must be definite and serious reasons for this, and the reasons must be presented to competent interdisciplinary and independent bodies to be verified and authorised.
When in ten years, dementia is going to increase exponentially, and the younger generations couldn’t reach their God-given potential, it won’t help to say “we didn’t need the masks”.
[..]How can a veterinarian, a software distributer, a business man, an electrical car manufacturer and a physicist decided on matters regarding the health of the entire population? Please dear colleagues, we all have to wake up.
I know how damaging oxygen deprivation is for the brain, cardiologist knows it for the heart, the pulmonologist knows it for the lungs. Oxygen deprivation damages every single organ.
Where are our health departments, our health insurance, our medical associations? It would have been their duty to be vehemently against the lockdown and to stop it and stop it from the very beginning.
Why do the medical boards give punishments to doctors who give people exemptions? Does the person or the doctor seriously have to prove that oxygen deprivation harms people? What kind of medicine are our doctors and medical associations representing?
Who is responsible for this crime? The ones who want to enforce it? The ones who let it happen and play along, or the ones who don’t prevent it?[..]It’s not about masks, it’s not about viruses, it’s certainly not about your health. It is about much much more. I am not participating. I am not afraid.

[..]You can notice, they are already taking our air to breathe.
The imperative of the hour is personal responsibility. We are responsible for what we think, not the media. We are responsible for what we do, not our superiors. We are responsible for our health, not the World Health Organization. And we are responsible for what happens in our country, not the government.”


The reader should now understand why the above post was not meant for maskholes.  

NOTE: Soon after I finished this I did an internet search for the word "maskhole" and discovered that it was already in use by maskholes against us humans.  Apparently we are maskholes to them because we selfishly put the public in danger by not wearing one.  How stupid.  Aren't maskholes supposed to be protected?  But it is not really about that you see.  Maskholes could be 20 ft away behind a giant Plexiglas barrier but they still require YOUR conformity & submission.   


bottom of page